We seek to answer: why hasn’t social finance caught on in the past and what is needed to extend and broaden the recent growth?
BNY Mellon has been helping apply capital to social change for more than 225 years. It began with a loan to a fledgling government undertaking a large social experiment: The United States of America and democracy. We continue to think about the potential for investments to enable positive change today. The size and complexity of current environmental, social, and governance issues facing the global economy have motivated us to assess the market structure in order to address these issues, highlight some of the challenges to greater and more effective deployment of capital, and propose ways to address those challenges. We seek to answer: why hasn’t social finance caught on in the past and what is needed to extend and broaden the recent growth?
Investments we make today can influence the extent to which future generations will be able to live within the boundaries of our resources and social systems. At BNY Mellon, we’re focused on the role that investors play as a source of capital to address economic, social, and environmental problems. However, portfolios need to serve financial goals. Social finance — investments that generate financial returns and include positive social and environmental impact — should offer investors an opportunity to protect and grow their financial assets in the face of a shifting global landscape, as well as to support solutions to some of the world’s toughest problems. Investment professionals in social finance are familiar with a number of global challenges and associated statistics, as are most mainstream investors 1, but it is worth noting their diversity and size. Here we reiterate the importance of global social, economic, and financial trends, define our social finance universe, and present attributes of attractive social finance products.
We then identify challenges and barriers to realizing social finance at scale, and propose five categories of actions to overcome these challenges going forward. Results stem from our own insights, sponsored research conducted by Business for Social Responsibility (BSR), and conversations with dozens of mainstream and social finance investors. Of the five action categories to address challenges to scale, four address barriers that appear to be preventing more capital from being allocated to social finance: accessibility, measurement, transparency, and systemic change. We believe the fifth category, collaboration, will be a key ingredient to the overall success of growing social finance. Within these five categories, we distinguish 12 specific recommended actions that are especially applicable to large, broad financial services firms such as BNY Mellon. We are addressing many of these actions in our product areas and within other activities at BNY Mellon today.
Large global environmental and social shifts have rapidly gained recognition as factors that present significant risks and opportunities, particularly as we face the threat of global instability. These shifts are part of what is addressed by the ESG risk analysis used by many professional investors.
By 2050, the world population is expected to grow by more than 30 percent, with the majority of this growth happening in urban areas in the developing world. The resulting 9.5 billion people will face added challenges in an already resource constrained world.3
Without further financing, the gap is likely to grow. Funding will be required to meet growing needs related to issues like climate change and rapid population growth, for example in areas including low-carbon technologies and consumer industries. Notably, the annual global investment needed in developing countries in key sectors related to the proposed UN Sustainable Development Goals is estimated to range from US$3.3 trillion to US$4.5 trillion. Current investment in these sectors is around US$1.4 trillion, leaving an investment gap of between US$1.9 and US$3.1 trillion per year.4 Industry-wide, greater effort is needed to motivate the investment community and engage clients.5
Ignoring risks presented by the shifting global landscape has implications for investors’ long-term returns. Natural resource constraints, global health threats, social instability, and demographic changes are already presenting business leaders with challenges, and are shaping decisions that will affect future business success and investment performance. These realities have been recognized and have resulted in policy shifts, for example, in some large US and non-US public investment funds.7,8
“For us, social finance refers to any investment activity that generates financial returns and includes social or environmental impact.”
A growing number of investors recognize the importance of these global movements as it relates to their investment decisions and are adjusting their investment management strategies accordingly. In the United States alone, the total value of professionally managed assets integrating socially responsible investing (SRI) considerations expanded to nearly US$7 trillion at the start of 2014, from just under US$4 trillion at the start of 2012.9
BNY Mellon defines social finance more broadly than what is traditionally considered SRI. For us, social finance refers to any investment activity that generates financial returns and includes social or environmental impact.10 Across asset classes, it encompasses diverse investment strategies and products that deliver a range of risk-adjusted returns, align with different investor motivations and goals, and differ in terms of how explicitly or intentionally they strive for positive social and environmental outcomes. We here define, and will continue to track, an industry-wide, global asset pool that currently stands at $22 trillion11 — a number which we believe will grow as investors intentionally direct capital to social finance. Reflecting the diverse capabilities of BNY Mellon, this asset pool includes four primary strategies: SRI, environmental finance, development finance and microfinance, and impact investing, as illustrated in the global social finance market size figure.12
Framing social finance holistically — combining multiple strategies together under a broader social finance objective — is helpful from two perspectives. For investors, it provides visibility on where capital is most needed and on opportunities for further deployment. For providers, especially broad financial service firms, it provides an arena where we can encourage expertise to grow social finance throughout the life cycle of securities from origination to investment to custody.
The industry has made significant progress creating attractive social finance products. Here we reiterate key attributes that end users seem to be seeking. We believe social finance products can succeed at scale when they:
While social finance is gaining traction among many mainstream investors, there have been, and remain, challenges to unlocking its full potential:
Translating growing investor interest in social finance into significant capital allocation will require fundamental changes to the current system. This includes not only improving products to meet investor goals and performance expectations, but also strengthening the enabling environment, including the infrastructure, skills, and incentives that shape business decisions. This requires a collective effort by all members of the investment community to overcome key challenges and facilitate increased participation.
Investors themselves have an important role to play. Levers at their disposal include: investing their capital, engaging policymakers, seeking technical expertise to use best practices, and piloting new innovations. We propose five conditions that are necessary to allow investors and intermediaries to work together to bring social finance to scale. We elaborate on these with 12 specific actions, and we will look to support implementation of these conditions alongside other actors including policy makers, intermediaries, and issuers.
Our goal is to enable investor capital to advance social finance. By harnessing expertise from across our firm, our capabilities in SRI and ESG integration and our knowledge of market infrastructure will facilitate and encourage increased use of social finance products.
Across BNY Mellon business lines, our recommendations to bring social finance to scale are already guiding our own activities in product development, thought leadership, and partnerships. Company-wide product development is underway to meet clients’ growing demand for engagement in the social finance field. We look to support capacity-building efforts by actively participating in knowledge sharing opportunities, forming strategic partnerships, and creating leading research and thought leadership to help influence capital markets globally. We are working to promote education and dispel misinformation. In terms of products and services, we are:
At BNY Mellon, our efforts span securities origination, investment management and investment services, and demonstrate what an investment company can do in social finance.
1We use the term “mainstream investor” to refer to two primary groups of actors: Institutional investors and individual investors who are not primarily engaged in social finance. This typically includes insurance companies, high net-worth individuals, family offices, pension funds, foundations, endowments, mutual funds, hedge funds, private equity companies, venture capital firms, and financial institutions/banks.
2 Mercer, “Climate Change Scenarios – Implications for Strategic Asset Allocation,” 2011.
3 United Nations Department of Economic and Social Affairs, “World Population Prospects: The 2012 Revision,” 2013.
4 United Nations Conference on Trade and Development, “World Investment Report,” 2014.
5 TIAA-CREFF Asset Management, “Socially responsible investing: Strong interest, low awareness of investment options,” 2014.
6 Global Commission on the Economy and Climate, “The New Climate Economy,” 2014.
7 Mercer, “Responsible Investment’s next decade: Developing CalPERS Total Fund process for ESG integration,” 2011.
8 The Wall Street Journal, “Norway Oil Fund Would Exit Coal – Exposed Firms Under Deal in Parliament,” 2015.
9 USSIF, “Report on US Sustainable, Responsible and Impact Investing Trends 2014,” 2014.
10 Some stakeholders may refer to the definition and these strategies by different names and might consider including a different mix of strategies within the definition.
11 Based on internal analysis of existing assets across SRI, environmental finance, development finance, microfinance, and impact investing as of 12/31/14.
12 Based on data aggregated from JP Morgan and GIIN, “Eyes on the Horizon: The Impact Investor Survey,” 2015; Global Sustainable Investment Alliance, “2014 Global Sustainable Investment Review,” 2014; Climate Policy Initiative, “The Global Landscape of Climate Finance,” 2014; Climate Bonds Initiative, “Bonds and Climate Change: The State of the Market in 2014”, 2014; Bloomberg New Energy Finance, “Rebound in Clean Energy Investment in 2014 Beats Expectations,” January 9th, 2015; OECD, “Statistics on research flows to developing countries,” 2014; Mix Market, “Microfinance Institutions: Countries and Regions,” aggregated March 2015.
13 University of Oxford & Arabesque Partners, “From the Stockholder to the Stakeholder: How Sustainability can Drive Financial Outperformance,” 2014.
14 Hoepner, et al., “Does Pension Funds’ Fiduciary Duty Prohibit the Integration of Environmental Responsibility Criteria in Investment Processes? A Realistic Prudent Investment Test,” 2011.
15 Morgan Stanley, “Sustainable Signals: The Individual Investor Perspective,” 2015.
16 University of Oxford, Oxford Martin School, “Now for the Long Term: The Report of the Oxford Martin Commission for Future Generations,” 2013.
17 Kubzansky, et al., Monitor Group, “Promise and Progress: Market-based solutions to poverty in Africa,” 2011.
18 Federal Reserve Bank of San Francisco, “Capital Markets for Scale, Proceedings from a Convening – Concluding Thoughts,” 2012.
19JP Morgan and GIIN, “Impact Investments, an emerging asset class,” 2010.
BNY Mellon is the corporate brand of The Bank of New York Mellon Corporation and may be used as a generic term to reference the corporation as a whole and/or its various subsidiaries generally. Products and services may be provided by various subsidiaries, affiliates, joint ventures and in some instances by third party providers of The Bank of New York Mellon Corporation where authorized and regulated as required within each jurisdiction. Not all products and services are offered in all countries. This material may not be comprehensive or up to date and there is no undertaking as to the accuracy, timeliness, completeness or fitness for a particular purpose of information given. BNY Mellon will not be responsible for updating any information contained within this material and opinions and information contained herein are subject to change without notice. BNY Mellon assumes no direct or consequential liability for any errors in or reliance upon this material. Information contained in this material that was obtained from third party sources has not been independently verified by BNY Mellon, which does not guarantee the completeness or accuracy of such information.
This material may not be reproduced or disseminated in any form without the prior written permission of BNY Mellon. Trademarks, logos and other intellectual property marks belong to their respective owners.
© 2015 The Bank of New York Mellon Corporation. All rights reserved.