With U.S. equity indexes near all-time highs, calls grow louder that stocks are overvalued. Our latest analysis, however, shows anything but.
It is hard to turn on the TV, read a business journal or follow Twitter without someone proclaiming that equity markets are grossly overvalued. Rather than being a source for celebration, these new highs have instilled fear of a possible market correction. Industry experts and spokespeople have been warning us about these elevated valuations for years — all the while watching equity markets rally to all-time highs.
This pushback is not new, however. As I approach my third anniversary at BNY Mellon, the persistent objection has been that markets are overvalued and long overdue for a correction. To offer some perspective, when I joined the firm, the Dow Jones Industrial Average had roughly doubled from its bear market trough of 2009, so the arguments for a substantial pullback seemed justified — even if they turned out to be incorrect. Since then, the Dow has moved from 12,500 to 18,000, up nearly 50%.
Perhaps this bull market is not your father’s, or even your grandfather’s, bull market. By that, I mean just comparing current levels to the past, whether the Dow, the S&P 500, or the NASDAQ, does not present a complete picture of the risks and rewards or potential return that exist. Looking beyond all-time highs, it is imperative to gain a deeper perspective of valuation in order to determine whether a market is under or overvalued. While valuation is but one factor to consider in total portfolio construction, it is also important to know when to emphasize certain factors over others. Valuation is the appropriate factor in times like these.
The fact that we are at all-time highs should be nearly irrelevant. Consider the NASDAQ, which is near the 5,000 level reached during the late 1990s/ early 2000s. At that time, many technology stocks, included Cisco, were selling at multiples of over 100x earnings (Figure 1a). Today, that is not the case, with large capitalization stocks selling at very modest valuation levels, primarily in the mid-teens. (Figure 1b).
Our friends at Strategas have identified 13 different ways to look at valuation (Figure 2). Using these valuation ratios, current data are compared to long-term averages to produce a “current relative average” measure. Eight of the 13 measures show the market to be fairly valued, while two show the market to be undervalued, namely Price-to-Free Cash Flow (P/FCF) and the S&P 500 priced in terms of gold. Only three measures show the market to be overvalued, namely the trailing P/E to Growth ratio (PEG), Forward P/E to Growth ratio, and the S&P 500 when priced in terms of oil.
Let’s analyze each of the variables that indicates the market is overvalued. Whenever a company’s price/earnings multiple is divided by its earnings growth rate, we must compare the current rate of growth to its historic average. Since we have had slow growth over the past few years relative to the average growth rates of the past 10 years, this computation would show the market to be overvalued, which it does. The same is true when you look at the Forward P/E to Growth ratio. If growth is to pick up in the near future, as we expect, this technique would cause the valuation to near its historical norm. The market also looks expensive when priced in oil, which seems natural recover, even modestly, as we believe it will over time, this valuation methodology would also yield a value which is more aligned with historical valuations.
|March 2000||March 2009||Current||20-Yr Avg||Current Rel Avg|
|Forward Consensus P/E||26.9||10.3||17.2||16.2||1.06|
|Trailing Normalized P/E||46.5||11.0||25.1||26.1||0.96|
|Price / Book Value||5.1||2.0||2.8||3.0||0.96|
|EV / EBITDA||15.7||10.1||11.9||12.1||0.98|
|P / OCF||20.4||6.6||12.8||13.3||0.96|
|P / FCF||73.0||11.9||23.0||36.9||0.63|
|EV / Sales||2.9||1.4||2.1||2.0||1.03|
|S&P 500 in WTI Terms||54.5||14.4||36.3||31.1||1.17|
|S&P 500 in Gold Terms||5.4||0.7||1.8||2.4||0.74|
Thus, a small pickup in economic growth and a slight recovery in the price of oil would make these “overpriced” variables look quite different.
Summarizing the data in the figure above also illustrates that “fair” value is very dependent upon the variables used to determine fairness. It is also very interesting that averaging the 13 variables yields a relative number of 1.0015 — another indicator that the market is fairly valued. Quite amazing, actually.
While the work of Strategas provides a wonderful historical perspective, I’ve always believed that in order to fully understand markets and historical valuation, it is necessary to do one’s own work. For the last two decades, I’ve utilized multiple regression analysis to determine a valuation technique that has been shown to value markets appropriately in real time. As markets moved from significantly undervalued in early 2009 to undervalued in 2011 and to fairly valued today, this valuation methodology allowed me to actively reap the benefits from these market shifts. By applying this objective historical perspective, removed from emotion, we have maintained an overweight equity exposure in client portfolios when other industry strategists were proclaiming the market to be too expensive.
I learned long ago that valuation is usually not a very good timing tool, as markets have a long history of staying over- or undervalued for extended periods of time. Furthermore, only when valuation reaches extreme levels, either over- or undervaluation, should it be used as an indicator to adjust asset allocation. Since we are not at extreme levels, our Investment Strategy Committee looks at many variables in addition to valuation, such as inflation, interest rates and earnings to determine how we should position client portfolios.
Although indexes are at record highs, valuations are not. And that, as they say in any market, makes all the difference. Rather than sell out of equities, we instead continue to favor stocks over bonds, while recognizing that the market tide will not lift all boats, as it did in the earlier stages of the bull market.
Fairly valued markets favor managers with a prowess for stock picking, as stock performance diverges due to individual company characteristics. So far, after a difficult 2014, 2015 has been more true to form, with many active managers beating their benchmarks by wide margins as a result of strong security selection.
Unlike your father or grandfather’s bull market, we believe this one still has some room to run, but investors should anticipate more moderate returns, as well as some increased volatility, as equities ultimately push higher.
This material is provided for illustrative/educational purposes only. This material is not intended to constitute investment or financial advice, but to the extent it may be deemed to be a financial promotion under non-US jurisdictions, it is provided for use by professional investors only and not for onward distribution to, or to be relied upon by, retail investors. Effort has been made to ensure that the material presented herein is accurate at the time of publication. However, this material is not intended to be a full and exhaustive explanation of all of the investment or financial options available. The information discussed herein may not be applicable to or appropriate for every investor and should be used only after consultation with professionals who have reviewed your specific situation. Products and services may be provided in various countries by the subsidiaries and joint ventures of The Bank of New York Mellon Corporation. Each is authorized and regulated as required within each jurisdiction. This material should not be construed as an offer or solicitation of securities or services or an endorsement thereof in any jurisdiction or in any circumstance that is otherwise unlawful or not authorized.
BNY Mellon Wealth Management conducts business through various operating subsidiaries of The Bank of New York Mellon Corporation.
©2015 The Bank of New York Mellon Corporation. All rights reserved.
Director of Investment Strategy, BNY Mellon Wealth Management
Jeff Mortimer is the director of investment strategy for BNY Mellon Wealth Management. In this role, he leads a team that sets capital market expectations and is responsible for making asset allocation recommendations. Jeff has more than 25 years of experience in the financial services industry.View Profile