While return on investment remains of utmost importance to investors around the world, those same investors increasingly recognize the importance of considering environmental, social and governance (ESG) issues when making investment decisions.
Indeed, sophisticated investors have long understood that neglecting these considerations can raise risks of financial loss in their portfolios. Unethical or neglectful behavior by a company or government in one of these areas can harm those who invest in a company’s stock or a sovereign’s bond as well as the environment or society in which a company or government is located.
The revelations that a major automaker used software in its diesel cars to circumvent government-mandated emission tests is an example of poor corporate governance leading to environmental harm and financial loss for investors. That failure of governance may have allowed elevated levels of unhealthful emissions into the air as well as expose the company and its shareholders to the financial harm from potential lawsuits and fines by regulators.
In this instance, the potential harm resulting from poor governance is not limited to public health and the automaker’s employees and shareholders. Investors and workers in many unrelated areas of the automotive industry now find themselves facing potential consequences due to increased scrutiny of the sector.
Fortunately, improving governance and promoting corporate and government policies that encourage sustainable, long-term growth can also benefit investors. By using their influence as shareholders, investors can reduce their ESG-related risks by insisting that companies and governments address potential environmental and social factors that threaten the long-term sustainability of companies and the environment.
As investors’ understanding of the links between ESG factors and portfolio risk grows increasingly sophisticated, investment managers including BNY Mellon’s investment affiliates are responding by increasing the role ESG plays in their investment processes. Indeed, many of these investment managers are increasing their capabilities for researching these factors and have integrated what they learn from that research into their investment processes.
BNY Mellon’s investment affiliates take a range of approaches to responsible investing that reflect their specialization in various asset classes and areas of the market. Among them, Insight Investment, Newton, Siguler Guff, Mellon Capital and Standish are signatories to the UN’s Principles for Responsible Investment, which requires them to consider ESG factors in their investment decisions. Other affiliates are also actively involved with ESG and socially responsible investing.
While interest in ESG is now rising among U.S. investors, European investors have long taken a strong interest in the role of these factors in portfolio construction and management. That long-standing interest, combined with regulations such as the UK’s Stewardship Code has created an environment where European investors expect managers to not just demonstrate familiarity with the role that ESG factors play in investing, but to have integrated management of these factors into the way they manage portfolios. In the past several years, regulators in Japan, Canada and Australia have also pushed investment managers to pay greater attention to ESG considerations. Stephan Bonte, head of sustainable investing at Standish Mellon Asset Management says, “Europe has been at the forefront of ESG and it continues to be. There, institutional asset owners have taken the lead. They know precisely what they want to achieve and seek the manager who can best deliver it. Increasingly, sustainability and focus on ESG criteria are explicitly written into the bylaws of pension and sovereign wealth funds.” Indeed, as the chart below shows, the rise of ESG investment both in terms of the number of managers who practice it and in the size of the portfolios they manage has grown steadily.
Though U.S. federal regulators have not played the sort of role in encouraging the growth of responsible investing that regulators have elsewhere, they are now removing what had been a significant obstacle to ESG adoption by U.S. institutional investors. In October 2015, the Department of Labor (DoL) revised an aspect of the Employee Retirement Income Security Act (ERISA) that governs U.S. pension funds to increase the ability of plan sponsors to consider ESG factors in their investment choices without breaching their fiduciary duties.
The DoL’s shift in its approach to ESG under ERISA comes at a time when many U.S. investors are reconsidering how they think about risk. Sandra Carlisle, head of responsible investment at Newton Investment Management, sees a rise in interest from investors around risks that seem increasingly real. “Investors are increasingly concerned about big long term risks to the sustainability of firms and industries, such as those posed by climate change. In 2009, the UN Climate Conference in Copenhagen was largely ignored by U.S. investors. Since then, interest in climate has increased in part due to the increasingly visible effects of changing weather patterns in the U.S. as well as a much more sympathetic administration,” she says.
Many investors seek to reduce or remove exposure to carbon-intensive industries from their portfolios. Their interest in low-carbon strategies reflects the same sentiment shown by the nations at the 2015 Paris climate summit who called climate change a “common concern of humankind” and set a goal of limiting the earth’s warming to less than two degrees above pre-industrial levels.
The political will on display in Paris suggests that regulation of carbon emissions will increase, with implications for institutional investors. Karen Wong, Head of Equity Portfolio Management at Mellon Capital Management, notes some U.S. states and cities are actively pushing for carbon divestiture in their retirement plans.
Carbon emissions are easier to measure than other ESG criteria. Significant advances have been made in measuring the carbon footprints of corporations and in standardizing the measurement of emissions. More reliable data may increase investors’ confidence that low-carbon strategies can impact emissions.
Mellon Capital CEO Gabriela Parcella recognizes the urgency around reducing emissions. “ESG factors are now being viewed as risk factors that need to be taken into account as part of an investment decision,” she says. “We have seen growing numbers of foundations, universities and other institutional investors interested in investing where they can address environmental and social challenges. It is our responsibility as an investment management firm to support this innovative approach.” Parcella explains that Mellon Capital takes an all-encompassing approach. “Our strategy’s main objective is to provide broad equity exposure while assessing, recognizing, and supporting strong climate performance. We target a 50% or greater reduction in carbon emissions versus the benchmark and a deviation in investment performance, or tracking error, of 50 basis points or less.”
Percentage by which removing energy stocks from the MSCI All Country World Index would have lowered or increased the index’s return from 1996 to 2014.
“The expression of political will on display in Paris suggests that increased regulation of carbon emissions may be at hand.”Karen Q. Wong
While carbon emissions are an area of rising concern right now for both investors and BNY Mellon’s investment affiliates, other social considerations have long been taken into account by our affiliates.
In 2006, EACM, BNY Mellon’s multi-manager fund of hedge fund specialist, brought societal considerations to the world of hedge fund strategies by specifically prohibiting the managers whom it hires from investing in areas such as abortion, stem cell research and pornography, as well as restricting exposure to gambling, tobacco and weapons. According to Tracey Hayes, Chief Risk Officer at EACM, this social impact emphasis appeals strongly to a diverse group of investors, including religious orders, social service agencies, healthcare providers and educational institutions. EACM also assesses its managers’ portfolios’ broader ESG footprints as well, and appreciates that the vast majority of their underlying holdings rank highly on such metrics.
Concerns about governance, too, have long played a role in investment decision making among our affiliates. Jay Koh of Siguler Guff says, “Our firm has considered ESG issues in its investment theses and processes throughout the firm’s history, and formalized our ESG framework with the adoption of the firm’s responsible investment policy in 2013. As the first U.S. private equity firm to directly invest in Russia, we quickly learned the importance of ESG issues from an investment, due diligence and monitoring standpoint.” Koh says making ESG part of Siguler Guff’s approach to investment risk analysis and asset management is “particularly important because we invest in emerging markets where the governance landscape can vary, and environment and social issues can be quite pressing.”
The approaches BNY Mellon’s investment affiliates take toward implementing ESG considerations in their investment processes reflect their areas of specialization as investment managers. Each approach used by our investment affiliates falls into one the categories in the chart below.
Equity investors who want to have an impact on climate or social considerations look at whether corporations have good governance, labor relations and policies to mitigate risk of injury and pollution. They can use their rights as shareholders to press for improvements in those areas. Equity managers such as Newton have built up their research capabilities and are using what they glean from that research to apply leverage to company managements in a process known as engagement, using an investor’s rights as a shareholder to push for changes in policy or governance. Carlisle says, “Before we make an investment decision, we give every holding on the Newton research recommended list an ESG quality review that assesses material ESG factors. Where we assess a high degree of ESG risk, we will always engage the company when we invest. For example, if we are unhappy about the lack of independence on a board, we will ask the company to put in independent directors. We also engage on climate change with extractive companies to understand their approach to stranded asset risk in their portfolios. And in addition to engagement, we vote all of our proxies actively, so that companies know in every case whether we are supporting management or withholding support.”
Leigh Todd, investment analyst with The Boston Company Asset Management, also emphasizes the role of research for equity investors pursuing ESG strategies. She says her team’s ESG research emphasizes identifying the factors that are most likely to harm a company’s sustainability and long term growth. “I think that there’s an ability to more cohesively look at the whole market from an ESG perspective, more so than us as individual analysts or portfolio managers looking only at our own respective portfolios.”
ESG investing differs for groups such as Standish which are limited in engagement because as fixed income specialists the managers do not hold shares. Fixed income offers unique opportunities, though. “Fixed income’s potential as a new instrument for impact investing is increasing due to the development of tools to directly finance projects including green bonds, green bond principles and potentially also social bonds,” says Bonte. “But green bonds are not the whole story. Research shows that it is possible to lower the carbon footprint of credit portfolios significantly without materially affecting historical or future risk-adjusted expected returns. That approach combined with green bonds and equity considerations can make up the basis of a climate-aware allocation.”
Joshua Kendall, ESG analyst with Insight Investment also emphasizes the importance of increased ESG research and its application by investment teams. “It’s not about making ethical or moral judgments. We believe ESG research and its effective application gives analysts and portfolio managers greater insight into the quality and character of a corporate issuer. As a bond investor, we have a responsibility to identify risk factors and ESG complements our approach.”
The momentum driving the mainstreaming of ESG investing appears unlikely to reverse. “I believe it is inevitable that investors will be expected to apply responsible investment strategies across all that they do,” says Kendall. Even as ESG factors become increasingly part of the investment mainstream, some investors such as family offices, endowments and foundations are increasingly interested in using their investments primarily to generate social and or environmental benefits with financial return as a secondary goal. Historically, investors had difficulty finding so-called impact investment opportunities offering the risk and reward criteria equal to those available in the general corporate market, while also advancing a specific non-investment objective. That may be changing, however. “There’s a clear trend toward moving beyond the standard maximization of risk adjusted returns to also considering the impact on stakeholders,” says Bonte. The pace at which that trend yields investment opportunities may also be quickening. “We believe that self-defined impact investment funds that set out to achieve both of these objectives are still pretty early in their development cycle,” notes Koh. “But, when we examine our roughly three and a half billion dollars of emerging markets investments, we identify a significant volume that we believe are likely to generate measurable social and environmental benefits.”
BNY Mellon Investment Management is one of the world’s leading investment management organizations and one of the top U.S. wealth managers, encompassing BNY Mellon’s affiliated investment management firms, wealth management organization and global distribution companies. BNY Mellon is the corporate brand of The Bank of New York Mellon Corporation and may also be used as a generic term to reference the Corporation as a whole or its various subsidiaries generally. This information is not investment advice, though may be deemed a financial promotion in non-U.S. jurisdictions. Accordingly, where used or distributed in any non-U.S. jurisdiction, the information provided is for Professional Clients only. This information is not for onward distribution to, or to be relied upon by Retail Clients. For marketing purposes only. Any statements and opinions expressed are as at the date of publication, are subject to change as economic and market conditions dictate, and do not necessarily represent the views of BNY Mellon or any of its affiliates. The information has been provided as a general market commentary only and does not constitute legal, tax, accounting, other professional counsel or investment advice, is not predictive of future performance, and should not be construed as an offer to sell or a solicitation to buy any security or make an offer where otherwise unlawful. The information has been provided without taking into account the investment objective, financial situation or needs of any particular person. BNY Mellon and its affiliates are not responsible for any subsequent investment advice given based on the information supplied. This is not investment research or a research recommendation for regulatory purposes as it does not constitute substantive research or analysis. To the extent that these materials contain statements about future performance, such statements are forward looking and are subject to a number of risks and uncertainties. Information and opinions presented have been obtained or derived from sources which BNY Mellon believed to be reliable, but BNY Mellon makes no representation to its accuracy and completeness. BNY Mellon accepts no liability for loss arising from use of this material. If nothing is indicated to the contrary, all figures are unaudited. Any indication of past performance is not a guide to future performance. The value of investments can fall as well as rise, so investors may get back less than originally invested. Not for distribution to, or use by, any person or entity in any jurisdiction or country in which such distribution or use would be contrary to local law or regulation. This information may not be distributed or used for the purpose of offers or solicitations in any jurisdiction or in any circumstances in which such offers or solicitations are unlawful or not authorized, or where there would be, by virtue of such distribution, new or additional registration requirements. Persons into whose possession this information comes are required to inform themselves about and to observe any restrictions that apply to the distribution of this information in their jurisdiction. The investment products and services mentioned here are not insured by the FDIC (or any other state or federal agency), are not deposits of or guaranteed by any bank, and may lose value. This information should not be published in hard copy, electronic form, via the web or in any other medium accessible to the public, unless authorized by BNY Mellon Investment Management. This information is approved for Global distribution and is issued in the following jurisdictions by the named local entities or divisions: Europe, Middle East, Africa and Latin America (excl. Switzerland, Brazil, Dubai): BNY Mellon Investment Management EMEA Limited, BNY Mellon Centre, 160 Queen Victoria Street, London EC4V 4LA. Registered in England No. 1118580. Authorized and regulated by the Financial Conduct Authority. • Switzerland: Issued by BNY Mellon Investments Switzerland GmbH, Talacker 29, CH-8001 Zürich, Switzerland. Authorized and regulated by the FINMA. • Dubai, United Arab Emirates: Dubai branch of The Bank of New York Mellon, which is regulated by the Dubai Financial Services Authority. This material is intended for Professional Clients only and no other person should act upon it.• Singapore: BNY Mellon Investment Management Singapore Pte. Limited Co. Reg. 201230427E. Regulated by the Monetary Authority of Singapore. • Hong Kong: BNY Mellon Investment Management Hong Kong Limited . Regulated by the Hong Kong Securities and Futures Commission. • Japan: BNY Mellon Asset Management Japan Limited. BNY Mellon Asset Management Japan Limited is a Financial Instruments Business Operator with license no 406 (Kinsho) at the Commissioner of Kanto Local Finance Bureau and is a Member of the Investment Trusts Association, Japan and Japan Securities Investment Advisers Association. • Australia: BNY Mellon Investment Management Australia Ltd (ABN 56 102 482 815, AFS License No. 227865). Authorized and regulated by the Australian Securities & Investments Commission. • United States: BNY Mellon Investment Management. • Canada: Securities are offered through BNY Mellon Asset Management Canada Ltd., registered as a Portfolio Manager and Exempt Market Dealer in all provinces and territories of Canada, and as an Investment Fund Manager and Commodity Trading Manager in Ontario. • Brazil: this document is issued by ARX Investimentos Ltda., Av. Borges de Medeiros, 633, 4th floor, Rio de Janeiro, RJ, Brazil, CEP 22430-041. Authorized and regulated by the Brazilian Securities and Exchange Commission (CVM). The issuing entities above are BNY Mellon entities ultimately owned by The Bank of New York Mellon Corporation. BNY Mellon Investment Management EMEA Limited (“BNYMIM EMEA”) is the distributor of the capabilities of its investment managers in Europe, Middle East, Africa and Latin America. Investment managers are appointed by BNYMIM EMEA or affiliated fund operating companies to undertake portfolio management services in respect of the products and services provided by BNYMIM EMEA or the fund operating companies. These products and services are governed by bilateral contracts entered into by BNYMIM EMEA and its clients or by the Prospectus and associated documents related to the funds. BNY Mellon Cash Investment Strategies is a division of The Dreyfus Corporation. • Investment advisory services in North America are provided through four different SEC-registered investment advisers using the brand Insight Investment: Cutwater Asset Management Corp, Cutwater Investor Services Corp, Pareto New York LLC and Pareto Investment Management Limited. The Insight Investment Group includes Insight Investment Management (Global) Limited, Pareto Investment Management Limited, Insight Investment Funds Management Limited, Cutwater Asset Management Corp and Cutwater Investor Services Corp. • BNY Mellon owns 90% of The Boston Company Asset Management, LLC and the remainder is owned by employees of the firm. • The Newton Group (“Newton”) is comprised of the following affiliated companies: Newton Investment Management Limited, Newton Capital Management Limited (NCM Ltd), Newton Capital Management LLC (NCM LLC), NCM LLC personnel are supervised persons of NCM Ltd and NCM LLC does not provide investment advice, all of which is conducted by NCM Ltd. Only NCM LLC and NCM Ltd offer services in the U.S. • BNY Mellon owns a 20% interest in Siguler Guff & Company, LP and certain related entities (including Siguler Guff Advisers LLC). • BNY Mellon owns a 71% interest in Amherst Capital Management LLC (Amherst Capital), an indirect majority owned subsidiary. The remainder is owned by Amherst Holdings LLC which is independent of BNY Mellon and whose CEO is an employee of Amherst Capital. This information does not constitute an offer to sell, or a solicitation of an offer to purchase, any of the firms’ services or funds to any U.S. investor, or where otherwise unlawful. NM-2015-0276KL08 Exp: 7/2016 bnymellonim.com
All references to dollars are in US dollars unless specified otherwise.
This material may not be reproduced or disseminated in any form without the prior written permission of BNY Mellon. Trademarks, logos and other intellectual property marks belong to their respective owners.
The Bank of New York Mellon, member FDIC.
© 2016 The Bank of New York Mellon Corporation. All rights reserved.