Courts Wade Into Virtual Currencies

Courts Wade Into Virtual Currencies

September 2016

A A A

Court decisions regarding the legal status of virtual currencies just might be the kick that state legislatures need to address their status and make them a more viable asset class for institutional investors.

Recently, a Miami-Dade circuit court judge ruled that the state of Florida should not treat virtual currencies as money under existing laws.

Legal experts, however, doubt that decision will set a major precedent on how these currencies are treated in law.

Judge Teresa Pooler detailed her reasoning when dismissing the criminal case against Miami resident Michell Espinoza.

After selling $1,500 worth of bitcoins to an undercover agent of the Miami Electronic Crimes Task Force during a 2014 sting operation, prosecutors charged Espinoza with one count of operating an unlicensed money transfer business as a “payment instrument seller” and two counts of attempted money laundering.

“’Virtual Currency’ in not currently included in the statutory definition of a ’payment instrument;’ nor does Bitcoin fit into one of the defined categories listed,” Pooler wrote.

Her decision likely was a virtual shot at the Florida state legislature, agreed Dax Hansen and Keith Miller, partners in the blockchain technology and digital currency practice at Perkins Coie.

“When you look at the last paragraph or two of her decision, it really is a push for the legislature to adopt laws that are going to address virtual currencies,” said Miller.

Hansen is skeptical that state courts will make similar decisions in the remaining 47 states. (Montana and South Carolina do not regulate the money service businesses in their respective states.)

“It is possible that you will see questions like this arise in other jurisdictions where the law is not that clear and the court reaches a different conclusion,” he said.

Some states are actively addressing the status of virtual currencies within their boundaries.

New York has specific regulations fro virtual currency with its bit license; South Carolina recently updated its money-transmitter law to include reference to virtual currencies, and Washington is considering some amendments now, Hansen noted.

‘”The takeaway from this is that the courts recognize that technology is evolving, and the state laws that are in place have not kept with technology,” added Miller.

 

This article was from Markets Media and was legally licensed through the NewsCred publisher network.

BNY Mellon is the corporate brand of The Bank of New York Mellon Corporation and may be used as a generic term to reference the corporation as a whole and/or its various subsidiaries generally.  This material does not constitute a recommendation by BNY Mellon of any kind.  The information herein is not intended to provide tax, legal, investment, accounting, financial or other professional advice on any matter, and should not be used or relied upon as such.  The views expressed within this material are those of the contributors and not necessarily those of BNY Mellon.  BNY Mellon has not independently verified the information contained in this material and makes no representation as to the accuracy, completeness, timeliness, merchantability or fitness for a specific purpose of the information provided in this material.  BNY Mellon assumes no direct or consequential liability for any errors in or reliance upon this material.