BNY Mellon explores the impacts of changes to The Markets in Financial Instruments Directive, or MiFID, as proposed in a package of amendments known as MiFID II and a regulation known as MiFIR.
The objective of this paper is to provide BNY Mellon Asset Servicing's perspective on the impacts of changes to The Markets in Financial Instruments Directive ("MiFID" or the "Directive") as proposed in a package of amendments ("MiFID II") and a regulation ("MiFIR" or the "Regulation") currently under consideration by the European Parliament and the European Council. This paper will provide an overview of MiFID II and MiFIR and summarize the extent of the impacts that are known today. With the release of final standards expected in the next six months, further updates on impacts to Asset Servicing products and services will be provided.
The Markets in Financial Instruments Directive became a core pillar in the European Union ("EU") financial markets regulatory system when it was implemented on 1 November 2007. The Directive's main objectives were to increase competition, improve investor protection and, combined with other Directives, help create a single market for financial services and activities in the EU. The key measures implemented through the directive were: best execution and order handling practices, categorization of clients, investment research, conflicts of interest, outsourcing, transaction reporting, pre- and post-trade transparency and regulation of trade-related market infrastructure. The introduction of the Directive has resulted in lower trading costs per transaction, reduced bid-ask spreads and faster trading times as envisioned by the European Commission (the "EC").
However, expected benefits from the new competitive landscape have not flowed equally to all market participants. In particular, and it is the opinion of the European Commission that these benefits have not always been passed onto the end investor. The trading environment has become more complex and fragmented and the financial crisis has exposed weaknesses in the regulation of instruments (other than shares) traded mostly between professional investors (e.g., derivatives).
Expected benefits from the new competitive landscape have not flowed equally to all market participants. In particular, and it is the opinion of the European Commission that these benefits have not always been passed onto the end investor.
BNY Mellon Asset Servicing
After extensive review and consultation, MiFID II and MiFIR are being introduced to regulate various segments of the market and make them more transparent, with significant attention being paid to instruments traded Over-The-Counter ("OTC"). The EC also seeks to ensure investor protection given the complexity of some market instruments and markets.
The diagram below sets out the proposed timings for MiFID II/MiFIR. This schedule may change as details are released. Some changes will be implemented as regulations (under MiFIR) that will take direct effect in EU member states without transposition by those states. Others changes will be implemented through a directive that will then need to be transposed into the national laws of each member state.
MiFID II/MiFIR is split into two pieces of legislation: a Directive and a Regulation. Directives allow member states some flexibility in transposing to local law, whereas Regulations are binding on and take direct effect in all member states.
|THE MARKETS IN FINANCIAL INSTRUMENTS REGULATION (MiFIR) FOCUSES ON:||THE MARKETS IN FINANCIAL INSTRUMENTS DIRECTIVE (MiFID) FOCUSES ON:|
The scope outlines who is impacted, what activities and what instruments are considered by the Directive.
|*an addition from MiFID I|
The Directive can be summarized into seven main areas outlined in the below table. Further details on each area can be found throughout the remainder of this document.
|1. Market Structure||Introduces new market structures and expands the use of vehicles on those market structures|
|2. OTC Derivatives & Commodities||New to MiFID and in scope for MiFID II|
|3. Transparency||Expands the need for transparency and reporting beyond shares to depositary receipts, ETFs, derivatives, bonds, structured finance products and certificates|
|4. Investor Protection||Aims to enhance investor protection through upgraded selling rules and the use of pre-contractual documentation|
|5. Organizational Requirements||Stipulates the make up of boards and management committees, and their organizational responsibilities|
|6. Third Country Access||Sets out rules for those outside of the EU to do business within it|
|7. Position Limits||Lays out restrictions and position limits as well as details on sanctions|
A central aim of MiFID II is to ensure that all organized trading is conducted on a regulated trading venue, i.e., through regulated markets, multilateral trading facilities (MTFs), systematic internalisers (SIs) and organized trading facilities (OTFs). Identical pre- and post-trade transparency requirements will apply to all venues and identical organisation and market surveillance will apply to all four venues.
Certain derivatives will have to be traded on a regulated trading venue and ESMA will develop technical standards to determine the class of derivatives subject to the trading obligation and the date from which the trading obligation takes effect. ESMA has set out rules regarding suspension of instruments from trading venues as well as co-operation and exchange of information among the venues.
Trading venues must:
Trading venues on which commodity derivative contracts are traded must adopt appropriate or suitable alternative arrangements designed to support liquidity, prevent market abuse and ensure the orderly pricing and settlement conditions.
Firms are required to make public, on an annual basis, for each class of financial instruments, the top five execution venues where they have executed client orders in the preceding year. Venues where the most liquid commodity derivatives are traded should publish an aggregated weekly breakdown of the positions held by different types of market participants, including the clients of those not trading on their own behalf (i.e., as agent).
To complement various recent EU initiatives and to assist SMEs in obtaining financing, MiFID II would create a new subcategory of markets known as SME growth markets.
"Small and medium-sized enterprise" for the purposes of the Directive means a company that has had an average market capitalization of less than EUR 100 million on the basis of end-year quotes for the previous three calendar years.
An operator of such a market (which is usually operated as an MTF) could elect to apply to have the MTF also registered as an SME growth market if it meets certain conditions.
The registration of these markets should raise their visibility and profile and help lead to common pan-European regulatory standards for such markets that are tailored to take into account the needs of issuers and investors in these markets while maintaining existing high levels of investor protection.
As part of significant efforts under way to improve the stability, transparency and oversight of OTC derivatives markets, the G20 has agreed that trading in standardised OTC derivatives should move to exchanges or electronic trading platforms where appropriate. An OTC contract cleared through an exchange or trading platform will follow a process similar to that followed by current exchange-traded derivatives (i.e., futures and options).
Consistent with the requirements already proposed by the Commission (through EMIR) to increase central clearing of OTC derivatives, the proposed provisions in this Regulation will require trading in suitably developed derivatives to occur only on eligible platforms, that is, regulated markets, MTFs or OTFs. This obligation will be imposed on both financial and non-financial counterparties exceeding the clearing threshold in EMIR. The Commission and ESMA have yet to prescribe the list of "eligible" derivatives, taking into consideration the liquidity of the specific instruments.
The proposals would overcome the current fragmentation in the powers of regulators to monitor and supervise positions. In the interest of the orderly functioning of markets or market integrity, the authorities would be given explicit powers to:
Member States shall ensure that regulated markets, MTFs and OTFs which admit to trading or trade commodity derivatives or emission allowances or derivatives thereof:
Despite previous fraudulent activities, which eroded trust in the carbon market, the carbon market has experienced significant growth within the past 5 years with market size rising from Eur 6 billion to Eur 90 billion.
The lion's share of transactions are in the form of derivatives, many in the form of spot transactions, which are not currently subject to the same level of legislation.
Emission Allowances will be brought within the scope of MiFID II with the intention of enhancing the oversight of the carbon market. Specific pre- and post-trade transparency requirements will be developed, taking into account the specificities of emission allowances as instruments of trade and other unique features of the carbon market.
MiFID's overarching goals of promoting transparency, competition and investor protection are heavily dependent on the quality and availability of market data upon which investors and investment firms rely in the conduct of investment activity. In order to achieve MiFID's goals, it is necessary to focus on format, cost and capacity for consolidation so that data is available and meaningful for those who would rely on it.
Pre- and post-trade transparency requirements are to be extended beyond shares, however, due to the different structure of markets in non-equity instruments compared with those in equities, the precise transparency regime is expected to be tailored to specific types of instruments respectively. Post-trade requirements, to be specified in further detail in implementing legislation, are suggested for all bonds and structured finance products that are accompanied with a prospectus as well as all derivatives eligible for central clearing and those submitted to trade repositories, regardless of where the trades take place.
Pre-trade requirements, also to be further detailed in implementing legislation, are suggested for the same instruments both when traded on organized venues as well as when offered by investment firms in over-the-counter market.
To tackle transparency and reporting requirements, MiFID has split the articles relating to this into two sections:
In all markets, buyers need to know what prices sellers are quoting and vice versa, however, wholesale transactions are frequently carried out using non-public prices. "Dark pools", or platforms where trading interests interact without full pre-trade disclosure to other users or the public, are a common feature of financial markets and provide an example of such "non-public" pricing mechanisms.
MiFID II proposes to continue to allow dark pools to continue but only as long as they do not cause competitive distortions and reduce the overall efficiency of the price discovery process for the security concerned.
Limited cases where transparency can be waived, and for how long, will need to be precisely defined. Such waivers are necessary, for instance, to protect investors selling large quantities of shares to avoid moving the market down.
As transparency rules are extended to other instruments, the Regulation also envisions the possibility of specific waivers, taking into account the nature of trading and of the participants in the different asset classes. The specific conditions under which waivers may operate would, as for shares today, be defined in implementing measures once the regulation is approved.
Finally, the introduction of the new organized trading facility (OTF) category will vastly improve pre-trade transparency in the case of trading activity currently taking place in the dark, by subjecting these platforms to the same transparency conditions as other venues.
Market participants need data on trading activity, including prices and volumes in order to make decisions about how and when to invest. The data should be available on an equal and easily accessible basis.
At present various incentives exist for data providers and vendors to sell their data at rates or in a way which do not correspond to the "reasonable commercial basis" or to the straightforward "consolidation of data with similar data from other sources" which MiFID envisioned.
A series of steps are thus proposed to deliver on these objectives. Failing that, it is proposed that the Commission could define more precisely what constitutes a "reasonable commercial basis".
Investor Protection is one of the key aims of MiFID II and the enhancement of the investor protection framework strengthens the framework for the provision of investment advice and portfolio management.
It tackles inducements, i.e., the possibility for investment firms to accept incentives from third parties, and clarifies the conditions / arrangements for investors to transact freely. It re-enforces a framework on cross-selling and the requirements concerning funds / instruments belonging to clients. It classifies safekeeping (i.e. custody) - inappropriately - as a "core" investment service (this is inappropriate due to the fact that MiFID does not regulate post-trade activity, which instead is regulated under other more appropriate legislation) and is intended to improve the information delivered to clients in respect of services provided and orders executed.
Firms must act honestly, fairly and professionally in accordance with the best interest of the clients. Marketing materials must be fair, clear and not misleading. Information will be provided to clients on:
Member states must require that investment firms take all reasonable steps to obtain, when executing orders, the best possible result for their clients taking into account price, costs, speed, likelihood of execution and settlement, size, nature or any other consideration relevant to the execution of the order.
Selection criteria and appropriateness with respect to the management body:
To ensure members commit sufficient time to perform their duties, they are not allowed to combine at the same time more than one of the following combinations of positions:
Executive or non-executive directorships held within the same group are considered one single directorship.
The management body of an investment firm is required to ensure that the firm is managed in a sound and prudent way and in a manner that promotes the integrity of the market and the interest of its clients. To this end, the management body is required to:
The management body shall monitor and periodically assess the effectiveness of the investment firm's organisation and the adequacy of the policies relating to the provision of services to clients and take appropriate steps to address any deficiencies.
Members of the management body of any market operator face the same requirements as MiFID lays down for the management body of an investment firm.
A "Third country financial institution" is an entity, the head office of which is established in a third country, that is authorised or licensed under the law of that third country to carry out specified investment activities in the EU. The directive creates a harmonized framework for granting access to EU markets for firms and market operators based in third countries to ensure a level playing field for all financial services actors in the EU territory:
The provision of services to retail and professional clients requires the establishment of a branch in the EU that is appropriately regulated under MiFID to provide the relevant investment services. Sufficient initial capital should be at free disposal of the branch. This poses particular challenges for EU investment firms such as asset managers, brokers and global custodians requiring access to non-EU brokers, counter-parties and sub-custodians to access non-EU markets where the EU firms are acting for retail or professional clients.
Services provided to eligible counterparties would not require the establishment of a branch; third country firms could provide them subject to ESMA registration. They would be supervised in their country and agreement between the supervisors in third countries and national competent authorities and ESMA would be necessary.
Regulated markets, operators of MTFs and OTFs which admit trading or trade commodity derivatives must apply limits on the number of contracts which any given market participant or member can enter into over a specified period of time, or provide for an alternative arrangement such as position management with automatic review thresholds, with a view to:
Limits are to be transparent and non-discriminatory, specifying the scope, exemptions and clear quantitative thresholds.
Regulated markets, MTFs and OTFs which admit to trading/trade commodity derivatives or emission allowances must:
Member states will require members and participants of regulated markets, MTFs and OTFs to report to respective trading venues the details of their positions in real time, including positions held on behalf of their clients.
Administrative sanctions and measures will apply to those natural or legal persons, to investment firms and to market operators' management bodies responsible for a breach. Administrative sanctions and measures that can be applied include the following:
The impact of MiFID II and MiFIR is far reaching. The following table summarizes keys areas to be considered by clients and Asset Servicing providers. With the release of final standards expected in the next six months, further updates on impacts to Asset Servicing products and services will be provided.
BNY Mellon is the corporate brand of The Bank of New York Mellon Corporation and may also be used as a generic term to reference the corporation as a whole or its various subsidiaries. Products and services may be provided under various brand names. Products and services may be provided by various subsidiaries, affiliates, joint ventures and in some instances by third party providers of The Bank of New York Mellon Corporation where authorized and regulated as required within each jurisdiction, and may include The Bank of New York Mellon, One Wall Street, New York, New York 10286, a banking corporation organized and existing pursuant to the laws of the State of New York and operating in England through its branch at One Canada Square, London E14 5AL, England. Registered in England and Wales with FC005522 and BR000818 and authorized and regulated in the UK by the Financial Services Authority. Not all products and services are offered at all locations.
This material contained in this brochure is for general information and reference purposes only. It is not intended to provide legal, tax, accounting or other professional advice or investment advice on any matter, and is not to be used as such. BNY Mellon recommends that professional consultation should be obtained before using any investment service. This [brochure], and the statements contained herein, are not an offer or solicitation to buy or sell any products (including financial products) or services mentioned. This material is not intended for distribution to, or use by, any person or entity in any jurisdiction or country in which such distribution or use would be contrary to local law or regulation. Similarly, this material may not be distributed or used for the purpose of offers or solicitations in any jurisdiction or in any circumstances in which such offers or solicitations are unlawful or not authorized, or where there would be, by virtue of such distribution, new or additional registration requirements. Persons into whose possession this [brochure] comes are required to inform themselves about and to observe any restrictions that apply to the distribution of this document in their jurisdiction.