In his latest Investment Update, Jeff Mortimer takes a closer look at how the trade dispute has impacted both countries and what the partial trade deal may mean for the markets moving forward.
Tensions between the U.S. and China had been escalating before the recent round of trade talks in Washington, D.C. where a partial, “Phase 1" deal was agreed to in principle. Let's take a closer look at how the trade dispute has impacted each country and what the partial trade deal may mean for the markets moving forward.
China's economy continues to slow. Many of the reasons for the sluggishness are secular, including an aging population and the increasing public and household debt loads. Although China has taken steps to mitigate these issues, including modifying their “one child" policy in an attempt to raise the country's birthrate, they have made little headway.
From an economic standpoint, the amount of fiscal and monetary stimulus has not been aggressive enough. These efforts have only slowed the deceleration, they haven't accelerated growth. Specifically, China's industrial production growth rate was up more than 20% year-over-year in 2010 before falling into the teens during 2011. It continued a steep decline to about 6% in 2015, where it held steady before rebounding to 9% earlier this year, perhaps due to increased spending intended to offset upcoming tariffs. Since then, it fell to a 17-year low of 4.4% in August, before improving slightly in September. China's real GDP sits at 6.0% year-over-year through the third quarter, down from 6.2% in the second quarter.
China's official manufacturing Purchasing Managers' index (PMI) came in at 49.8 in September. This marks the fifth straight month of contraction. With China's economy comprised of roughly 20% exports as a percent of GDP, one can clearly see the impact tariffs are having. China's consumer is also starting to struggle, as evidenced by a decline in retail sales growth, which slowed to 7.8% year-over-year in September after a high of 9.8% in June.
U.S. economic growth is also slowing, but not as much as China. The U.S. economy is holding up fairly well thanks to a healthy consumer and a solid labor market. The most recent employment data, with an unemployment rate of 3.5%, depicts a healthy job market. While somewhat below expectations, the 136,000 jobs added in September remain impressive given we are in the longest economic expansion on record. Consumer confidence has waned slightly from recent all-time highs, but current levels still indicate a fair degree of optimism, which should bode well for spending going forward. Retail sales and housing also remain relative bright spots in our economy.
Manufacturing in the U.S. is a bit of a different story, as the most recent manufacturing PMI data show a contraction, with recent readings falling below the key level of 50. Keep in mind that just over 10% of the economy is exports; the consumer accounts for 70%. Still, I believe that uncertainty around trade continues to be one of the major reasons for the softness in manufacturing.
While the U.S. economy may have the upper hand relative to China, continued trade and tariff issues still have the ability to drive the global economy into recession if they remain unchecked. Trade, tariffs and the realignment of supply chains around the world are already having an impact on global growth. Global manufacturing metrics seem to be indicating that the world is on the verge of a manufacturing recession. Continued tit-for-tat tariffs have the potential to bring about a global recession.
So with the potential for global recession on the line, why aren't the two sides able to find some common ground? The short answer is that, for both sides, it is about more than just economics. The U.S.'s hard line in trade negotiations threatens China's ascendance as a global superpower. For the U.S., this trade war is not only about tariffs, but also about unfair business practices, national security concerns, forced technology transfer and intellectual property theft. China has only recently acknowledged these concerns. These U.S. demands have made China's plan to realize its ascension much more difficult.
Phase 1 of the trade deal postponed an increase in tariffs planned for mid-October in exchange for China agreeing to purchase $40-50 billion in agricultural goods (although this deal seems to be fluid, depending on which side is talking). However, it fails to touch upon all the larger, strategic issues. So while this trade truce has soothed market sentiment for now, we'd need to see further progress on some of these other, more challenging issues for us to change our economic outlook for slowing global growth.
Markets seem to be nostalgic for the old days, when comparative advantage and free trade were the norm. That is why markets continue to rally on good trade news and slump when there are setbacks in negotiations. Unfortunately, this is likely to continue for the foreseeable future. This trade war is also likely to persist regardless of who is in the White House after the 2020 election, as both parties seem to believe that the U.S. should maintain a tougher stance toward China.
Trade-related volatility in the markets is unlikely to abate, if for no other reason than the market's lack of practice in discounting (that is, correctly pricing) trade wars. It could be argued that the last significant trade war took place in 1930, at the beginning of the Great Depression. Markets therefore may be apt to react negatively to trade war rhetoric at first, asking questions only later. Investors might need to become accustomed to this.
As long as there are no major shocks to trade and tariff issues, markets should slowly adapt to this new normal over time. Our neutral equity stance is a manifestation of this view. Perhaps on the other side of this wrangling, somewhere after many mini-deals and fits and starts have subsided, a much better outcome exists: a world with lower tariffs and fewer trade restrictions. We believe the path to better outcomes may be longer, and bumpier, than most may currently believe.
This material is provided for illustrative/educational purposes only. This material is not intended to constitute legal, tax, investment or financial advice. Effort has been made to ensure that the material presented herein is accurate at the time of publication. However, this material is not intended to be a full and exhaustive explanation of the law in any area or of all of the tax, investment or financial options available. The information discussed herein may not be applicable to or appropriate for every investor and should be used only after consultation with professionals who have reviewed your specific situation. The Bank of New York Mellon, Hong Kong branch is an authorized institution within the meaning of the Banking Ordinance (Cap.155 of the Laws of Hong Kong) and a registered institution (CE No. AIG365) under the Securities and Futures Ordinance (Cap.571 of the Laws of Hong Kong) carrying on Type 1 (dealing in securities), Type 4 (advising on securities) and Type 9 (asset management) regulated activities. The services and products it provides are available only to “professional investors" as defined in the Securities and Futures ordinance of Hong Kong. The Bank of New York Mellon, DIFC Branch (the “Authorised Firm") is communicating these materials on behalf of The Bank of New York Mellon. The Bank of New York Mellon is a wholly owned subsidiary of The Bank of New York Mellon Corporation. This material is intended for Professional Clients only and no other person should act upon it. The Authorised Firm is regulated by the Dubai Financial Services Authority and is located at Dubai International Financial Centre, The Exchange Building 5 North, Level 6, Room 601, P.O. Box 506723, Dubai, UAE. The Bank of New York Mellon is supervised and regulated by the New York State Department of Financial Services and the Federal Reserve and authorised by the Prudential Regulation Authority. The Bank of New York Mellon London Branch is subject to regulation by the Financial Conduct Authority and limited regulation by the Prudential Regulation Authority. Details about the extent of our regulation by the Prudential Regulation Authority are available from us on request. The Bank of New York Mellon is incorporated with limited liability in the State of New York, USA. Head Office: 240 Greenwich Street, New York, NY, 10007, USA. In the U.K. a number of the services associated with BNY Mellon Wealth Management's Family Office Services– International are provided through The Bank of New York Mellon, London Branch, One Canada Square, London, E14 5LA. The London Branch is registered in England and Wales with FC No. 005522 and BR000818. Investment management services are offered through BNY Mellon Investment Management EMEA Limited, BNY Mellon Centre, One Canada Square, London E1C 5LA, which is registered in England No. 1118580 and is authorised and regulated by the Financial Conduct Authority. Offshore trust and administration services are through BNY Mellon Trust Company (Cayman) Ltd. This document is issued in the U.K. by The Bank of New York Mellon. In the United States the information provided within this document is for use by professional investors. This material is a financial promotion in the UK and EMEA. This material, and the statements contained herein, are not an offer or solicitation to buy or sell any products (including financial products) or services or to participate in any particular strategy mentioned and should not be construed as such. BNY Mellon Fund Services (Ireland) Limited is regulated by the Central Bank of Ireland BNY Mellon Investment Servicing (International) Limited is regulated by the Central Bank of Ireland. BNY Mellon Wealth Management, Advisory Services, Inc. is registered as a portfolio manager and exempt market dealer in each province of Canada, and is registered as an investment fund manager in Ontario, Quebec, and New Foundland & Labrador. Its principal regulator is the Ontario Securities Commission and is subject to Canadian and provincial laws. BNY Mellon, National Association is not licensed to conduct investment business by the Bermuda Monetary Authority (the “BMA") and the BMA does not accept responsibility for the accuracy or correctness of any of the statements made or advice expressed herein. BNY Mellon is not licensed to conduct investment business by the Bermuda Monetary Authority (the “BMA") and the BMA does not accept any responsibility for the accuracy or correctness of any of the statements made or advice expressed herein. Trademarks and logos belong to their respective owners. BNY Mellon Wealth Management conducts business through various operating subsidiaries of The Bank of New York Mellon Corporation. ©2019 The Bank of New York Mellon Corporation. All rights reserved.
Director of Investment Strategy, BNY Mellon Wealth Management
Jeff Mortimer is the director of investment strategy for BNY Mellon Wealth Management. In this role, he leads a team that sets capital market expectations and is responsible for making asset allocation recommendations. Jeff has more than 25 years of experience in the financial services industry.View Profile