A Good Start by the ECB

A Good Start by the ECB

March 2015


Standish Chief Investment Officer David Leduc and Chief Economist Tom Higgins comment on the debut of the quantitative easing program from the European Central Bank.

“The adoption of further balance sheet measures has become warranted to achieve our price stability objective.” — ECB President Mario Draghi

Executive Summary

  • The ECB has declared its intention to purchase €1.2 trillion in assets across government bond markets, agencies and European institutions in the secondary market.
  • We believe this opening salvo into QE will benefit euro area growth and will be helpful in combating the threat of deflation.
  • The Fed’s experience suggests that QE can lift financial assets prices, bolster confidence and lift economic activity through the “portfolio balance effect.”
  • We expect the European experience to be similar, though there is less room for asset prices to rise in the current environment.

A Good Start, But Will the ECB Eventually Need to Do More?

The European Central Bank (ECB) announcement of quantitative easing (QE) at its January policy meeting received a warm welcome from global markets. The ECB will purchase €60 billion a month from March 2015 until at least September 2016 for a total of about €1.2 trillion in asset purchases spread across government, asset-backed and covered bonds. Government bond purchases will be restricted to secondary markets, whilst private sector assets can and have been purchased in the primary market. The hope is that QE in the euro area will be as successful at bolstering asset prices, weakening the euro, lowering borrowing costs and turning the tide against disinflation as it was in the United States. Thus far, the results are promising with yields declining in most core and peripheral Europe bond markets with the notable exception of Greece.

However, the European situation is more challenging than the US in several key ways. First, core inflation and long-term interest rates are already much lower in Europe than they were in the United States at the beginning of QE. Indeed, the US core CPI excluding food and energy stood at 1.8% in December 2008 compared to the euro area core CPI, which hovered at just 0.6% in January 2015. This leaves the ECB with little cushion against deflation. To further complicate matters, short-term interest rates are already negative in many parts of the euro area and 10-year government yields are less than 40 basis points (bps) in the core economies, which compares to 2.27% in the United States before QE. Hence, asset purchases are unlikely to have the same stimulative effect that they did in the United States.

Finally, making policy decisions is more complex in Europe where the ECB must contend with the interests of the 19 separate countries with representation on Governing Council. As a consequence, the ECB may have been slower to act with QE coming 32 months after the European Debt Crisis peaked. Even worse, some ECB officials are already arguing the need to end QE depending on the trajectory of inflation and the program is only just beginning. By contrast, the Federal Reserve implemented its first round of QE in December 2008 just a few months after the Subprime Crisis peaked with the collapse of Lehman Brothers. Subsequently, the Fed added to its purchases with two more rounds of QE before finally winding down the program in October 2014. During that five-year period, the Fed increased its balance sheet five-fold to $4.5 trillion.

G4 Central Bank Balance Sheets
Source: Thomson Reuters Datastream, as of February 20, 2015.

G4 Central Bank Balance Sheets

Given the challenges the ECB faces in terms of disinflation and already low interest rates, we believe they need to be at least as aggressive as the Fed in their deflation battle. While the ECB’s initial effort appears to be a good one on par with the Fed’s first round of QE at around 11% of GDP, more will likely be necessary. This will need to be supplemented with efforts aimed at reducing Europe’s bad debt problems in countries such as Greece since high debt levels weigh on the ability of European consumers and businesses to borrow, which may negate the effectiveness of QE.

QE Successes and Failures

The effect of QE on the US economy and financial markets has generally been positive. Not only did the Fed’s asset purchases bring down long-term Treasury yields, they also helped lower yields on corporate bonds and mortgage-backed securities by encouraging investors to move down the risk ladder.1 This chain reaction amongst risk markets is known as the “portfolio balance effect” and it was highlighted by former Fed Chairman Ben Bernanke back in 2012. There was also a real economic benefit to QE as lower retail mortgage rates helped steady the housing market and reverse home price declines. In addition, a lower discount rate and improving economic outlook lifted stock prices and created a positive wealth effect.

One of the most immediate effects of QE in the US was a weakening of the dollar, similar to what we have seen more recently in Europe and Japan. Interestingly, the impact on the dollar was primarily felt in the first round of QE and gradually reversed in the second and third rounds as the prospects for the US economy improved. The Fed typically downplayed the dollar weakness as a benefit of QE arguing that exports were only 13% of GDP. The same cannot be said of countries such as Germany where exports make of roughly twice as large a share of output.

Much to the chagrin of the Fed, QE has failed to ignite inflation and inflation expectations in a sustained way. Early on, this mostly had to do with the deleveraging process in the United States, but today low energy prices and the weak global environment have almost certainly played a role.

Even so, it is important to point out that core inflation probably would have been much lower had it not been for Fed actions. In addition, recent concerns about the decline in inflation expectations appears to have been overstated given the divergence between market- and survey-based measures of inflation expectations. We believe this will change as the year progresses with the European recovery gathering momentum and a tighter US labor market, supporting wage growth. In fact, the 10-year TIPS (Treasury Inflation Protected Security) breakeven has already increased more than 20 basis points to 1.75bps from its January low.

How to Take Advantage of QE?

If past is prologue, some of the opportunities of European QE have probably already passed. For example, there may be less downside to the euro against the dollar, though much will depend on relative economic performance in the future. Indeed, as of February 2015 the euro has already weakened by 18% since last summer and regional growth indicators are starting to improve so there is not an obvious need for further euro weakness.

In the United States, one of the best ways to take advantage of QE was through buying up some of the most dislocated areas of the investment grade and high yield bond markets, which generally performed very well through the first and third rounds of QE. The only problem is that euro area corporate spreads are much more compressed today so one has to be more selective. The same is true for some peripheral sovereign bond markets, with the exception of Greece. Greater patience may be necessary for some pay off on the inflation front in Europe.

Comparison of US and European QE Programs
View Table
Note: Unemployment Rates and Core Inflation statistics refer to their respective regions.
Source: Bloomberg and Thomson Reuters Datastream, as of February 2015.

We anticipate that further balance sheet expansion by the ECB may be necessary in the coming years if it is really going to turn the tide against disinflation.

Standish Mellon Asset Management

Either way, we anticipate that further balance sheet expansion by the ECB may be necessary in the coming years if it is really going to turn the tide against disinflation. The Fed increased its balance sheet from 6% to 25% of GDP between 2008-2013 before achieving a sustained recovery. By contrast, Europe’s balance sheet has actually contracted over the past two years. The Japanese experience suggests that a more aggressive response early can help mitigate the downside risks.



1 Ben S. Bernanke. “Monetary Policy Since the Onset of the Crisis.” Jackson Hole, Wyoming. August 2012.

BNY Mellon Investment Management is one of the world’s leading investment management organizations and one of the top U.S. wealth managers, encompassing BNY Mellon’s affiliated investment management firms, wealth management organization and global distribution companies. BNY Mellon is the corporate brand of The Bank of New York Mellon Corporation and may also be used as a generic term to reference the Corporation as a whole or its various subsidiaries generally.

The information in this document is not intended to be investment advice, and it may be deemed a financial promotion in non-U.S. jurisdictions. Accordingly, where this document is used or distributed in any non-U.S. jurisdiction, the information provided is for Professional Clients only. This material is not for onward distribution to, or to be relied upon by, retail investors.

Any statements and opinions expressed in this document are as of the date of the article, are subject to change as economic and market conditions dictate, and do not necessarily represent the views of BNY Mellon or any of its affiliates. The information contained in this document has been provided as a general market commentary only and does not constitute legal, tax, accounting, other professional counsel or investment advice, is not predictive of future performance, and should not be construed as an offer to sell or a solicitation to buy any security or make an offer where otherwise unlawful. The information has been provided without taking into account the investment objective, financial situation or needs of any particular person. BNY Mellon and its affiliates are not responsible for any subsequent investment advice given based on the information supplied. This document is not investment research or a research recommendation for regulatory purposes as it does not constitute substantive research or analysis. To the extent that these materials contain statements about future performance, such statements are forward looking and are subject to a number of risks and uncertainties. Information and opinions presented in this material have been obtained or derived from sources which BNY Mellon believed to be reliable, but BNY Mellon makes no representation to its accuracy and completeness. BNY Mellon accepts no liability for loss arising from use of this material. If nothing is indicated to the contrary, all figures are unaudited.

Any indication of past performance is not a guide to future performance. The value of investments can fall as well as rise, so you may get back less than you originally invested.

This document is not intended for distribution to, or use by, any person or entity in any jurisdiction or country in which such distribution or use would be contrary to local law or regulation. This document may not be distributed or used for the purpose of offers or solicitations in any jurisdiction or in any circumstances in which such offers or solicitations are unlawful or not authorized, or where there would be, by virtue of such distribution, new or additional registration requirements. Persons into whose possession this document comes are required to inform themselves about and to observe any restrictions that apply to the distribution of this document in their jurisdiction. The investment products and services mentioned here are not insured by the FDIC (or any other state or federal agency), are not deposits of or guaranteed by any bank, and may lose value.

This document should not be published in hard copy, electronic form, via the web or in any other medium accessible to the public, unless authorized by BNY Mellon Investment Management.

This document is approved for Global distribution and is issued in the following jurisdictions by the named local entities or divisions: UK and in mainland Europe (excluding Germany): BNYMIM EMEA, BNY Mellon Centre, 160 Queen Victoria Street, London EC4V 4LA. Registered in England No. 1118580. Authorized and regulated by the Financial Conduct Authority. • Germany: Meriten Investment Management GmbH which is regulated by the Bundesanstalt für Finanzdienstleistungsaufsicht. • Dubai, United Arab Emirates: Dubai branch of The Bank of New York Mellon, which is regulated by the Dubai Financial Services Authority. This material is intended for Professional Clients only and no other person should act up on it. • Singapore: BNY Mellon Investment Management Singapore Pte. Limited Co. Reg. 201230427E. Regulated by the Monetary Authority of Singapore. • Hong Kong: BNY Mellon Investment Management Hong Kong Limited. Regulated by the Hong Kong Securities and Futures Commission. • Japan: BNY Mellon Asset Management Japan Limited. BNY Mellon Asset Management Japan Limited is a Financial Instruments Business Operator with license no 406 (Kinsho) at the Commissioner of Kanto Local Finance Bureau and is a Member of the Investment Trusts Association, Japan and Japan Securities Investment Advisers Association. • Australia: BNY Mellon Investment Management Australia Ltd (ABN 56 102 482 815, AFS License No. 227865). Authorized and regulated by the Australian Securities & Investments Commission. • United States: BNY Mellon Investment Management. • Canada: Securities are offered through BNY Mellon Asset Management Canada Ltd., registered as a Portfolio Manager and Exempt Market Dealer in all provinces and territories of Canada, and as an Investment Fund Manager and Commodity Trading Manager in Ontario. • Brazil: this document is issued by ARX Investimentos Ltda., Av. Borges de Medeiros, 633, 4th floor, Rio de Janeiro, RJ, Brazil, CEP 22430-041. Authorized and regulated by the Brazilian Securities and Exchange Commission (CVM).

The issuing entities above are BNY Mellon entities ultimately owned by The Bank of New York Mellon Corporation.

BNY Mellon Cash Investment Strategies is a division of The Dreyfus Corporation. • BNY Mellon Western FMC, Insight Investment Management Limited and Meriten Investment Management GmbH do not offer services in the U.S. This presentation does not constitute an offer to sell, or a solicitation of an offer to purchase, any of the firms’ services or funds to any U.S. investor, or where otherwise unlawful. • BNY Mellon Western Fund Management Company Limited is a joint venture between BNY Mellon (49%) and China based Western Securities Company Ltd. (51%). The firm does not offer services outside of the People’s Republic of China. • BNY Mellon owns 90% of The Boston Company Asset Management, LLC and the remainder is owned by employees of the firm. • The Newton Group (“Newton”) is comprised of the following affiliated companies: Newton Investment Management Limited, Newton Capital Management Limited (NCM Ltd), Newton Capital Management LLC (NCM LLC), Newton International Investment Management Limited and Newton Fund Managers (C.I.) Limited. NCM LLC personnel are supervised persons of NCM Ltd and NCM LLC does not provide investment advice, all of which is conducted by NCM Ltd. Only NCM LLC and NCM Ltd offer services in the U.S. • BNY Mellon owns a 20% interest in Siguler Guff & Company, LP and certain related entities (including Siguler Guff Advisers LLC).

©2015 The Bank of New York Mellon Corporation.